MMS Responds to Column on Question 4
In a column entitled Countering the anti-pot hysterics with a ‘yes’ on Question 4 published October 28 online in The Boston Globe, WGBH’s Margery Eagan took the opponents of recreational marijuana to task, labeling them as “hysterics” who are engaged in “reefer madness.”
In the column, she accuses the MMS of “shameful” behavior in its opposition to marijuana (both medical in 2012 and recreational in 2016).
MMS responded to the column October 31 in a letter to the editor from MMS President James S. Gessner, M.D. As of this posting, the letter has not appeared, so we publish it here for our members to read.
Marjorie Eagan may believe that opposing marijuana is “shameful” behavior by physicians, but her willingness to ignore the public health effects of legalization and discount the threat to children in favor of having a “really fun time” is simply irresponsible. (Countering the anti-pot hysterics with a ‘yes’ on Question 4, Oct. 28). Marijuana is not the harmless substance she and the proponents of Question 4 claim it to be.
Today’s marijuana has four times the amount of the mind-altering THC substance it had in years past, and its use can lead to addiction, impair cognition, risk pregnancy, and damage the developing brains of adolescents. Those are the facts, not reefer madness hysteria. Question 4 also offers no public health oversight and provides no resources for prevention, education, or treatment. It represents bad policy, and physicians take pride in advocating for public health over the ready access to a substance that can cause harm.
MMS and 11 physician specialty societies in Massachusetts have stated their strong opposition to Question 4 for a host of reasons. We urge voters to visit the National Institute on Drug Abuse and MMS websites for information on recreational marijuana and watch the October 30th CBS 60 Minutes report on the effects of recreational marijuana in Colorado. All three indicate that marijuana is not the harmless substance many people think it is.